Tuesday, March 31, 2020

Eight Values of Free Expression- Protect Dissent (week 11)





Of the eight speech theories, the one that stands out to me the most is the very last one. The eighth speech theory, from Steven Shiffrin, focuses on the idea that our government system is not supposed to be one of mob rule. Shiffrin says that the first Amendment protects minority views, no matter how small or unpopular they may be or seem. As a citizen, you have a strongly protected right to disagree with the government -and everyone else for that matter. This is something unique about our system, people fought for this right! As a citizen, it is your patriotic duty to criticize the government and to stand up for what you believe is right and just.

In 1798 and 1918, the Sedition act made it illegal to criticize the American government. Sounds crazy right? Well, it wasn't until around year 1919 that the sedition act was repealed.

The right to dissent stems from our first Amendment rights. As a citizen you have the right to disagree with the government and it is your duty to voice that opinion! You can voice this disagreement through freedom of speech, peaceful assembly, etc. It doesn't matter how, just know you can do it (legally of course). 





The video above better explains some of the logistics that go behind a citizens democratic right to dissent. Without the ability to dissent, America would be nowhere to the point it is at today. For example, women fought for the right to vote and surprisingly enough, its only been 100 years since that dissent. For years, people have been speaking up and demanding change for what they believe in. This right is something many other countries do not have the privilege of having.

As a young college student, I recently have been becoming more politically informed and aware of what changed and decisions are going on around me. Personally, I believe the eighth speech theory that focuses on political dissent, is one that should be exercised more often in our society. People to not understand what a privilege it is to have this right! Everyday, people online go to social media to complain about the government or what may be going on in politics. Instead, these people have the constitutional right to not just complain, but to actually take ACTION and show the government what we don't agree with and what changes must be made! Like Shiffrin said, the first Amendment even protects minority viewpoints, no matter how unpopular they may be. Us citizens have the duty to make these minority viewpoints heard.












Wednesday, March 4, 2020

Freedom of Speech and Youtube

YouTube is known as being a place where individuals are able to express themselves. Content on the platform ranges, there is a video posted for almost anything you could ever think of!  Users post videos of themselves doing anything from singing, tutorials, vlogs, and even just talking about different topics. But, what if Youtube is monitoring and censoring us as well as users more than we think? 
Recently, PragerU argued that Youtube has been "censoring" it's conservative views. Youtube had been removing advertisements and setting PragerU and censoring it's content to be "restricted mode" for adult viewing only. PragerU has around 2.5 million subscribers and is known for posting videos that attract a lot of criticism. For example they have posted videos that include masculine aggression and the nature of Islam. 

Judges decided that the United States constitution's First Amendment was not being violated in this case. Youtube is a private company, therefore they have the right to censor anything posted on their platform. The court said "Despite Youtube's ubiquity and its role as a public-facing platform, it remains a private forum, not a public forum". 

Personally, I agree with the courts ruling. Youtube is a private company therefore they may choose how the platform is run. In this case, Youtube only removed  PragerU's advertisements and censored their video for adults, Youtube did not remove the users content. Due to PragerU being known for posting "criticized" videos, I believe Youtube has the right to censor videos so only adults can view them.

Apple Lawsuit Over Slowing Down Older iPhones

There has always been a rumor that Apple slows down it's older model iPhones when a new one hits the market. Right when new iPhone models come out users immediately go to social media to complain about their phone slowing down. Personally, I never truly believed this rumor or even noticed a difference. I questioned if it was possible to have software that even allowed Apple do to this! But, the rumors were always true. Currently, Apple is being sued for slowing down older iPhones and will end up paying half a billion dollars to settle. 

The reasoning behind slowing down older iPhone models is to entice customers to go out and purchase a newer model phone. The settlement would require Apple to pay certain model iPhone users $25 per device. This would be extremely expensive and cost Apple anywhere from $310 million to $500 million. 

This legal battle has been going on for more than two years. It all started in 2017 when Apple admitted to using software updates that slow down older model phones. Apple claims that they were not pushing customers to buy new iPhone models, but instead the slowing down of the phones is caused by issues with older lithium-ion batteries. 

If you have purchased an iPhone 6, 6 plus, 6S, 6S Plus, 7, 7 Plus, or SE device before December 21st 2017 as well as live in the United States, you are eligible to file for a claim! I know I will be!